Showing posts with label colorado fiscal policy institute. Show all posts
Showing posts with label colorado fiscal policy institute. Show all posts

Friday, October 19, 2012

Recovery Watch - September 2012


The most recent economic data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics show a decrease in the state and national unemployment rates, this time for the right reasons. The Colorado unemployment rate was down 0.2 percentage points from 8.2 percent in August to 8.0 percent in September. The decrease in the unemployment rate for the month of September was due to an increase in the employment level rather than a decrease in the labor force. According to the Local Area Unemployment Statistics survey, the number of people employed in Colorado increased by more than 7,000 during the month of September. Also, enrollment in public assistance programs such as Medicaid, CHP+ and SNAP continued to increase in the month of September.

Unemployment
The unemployment rate in Colorado decreased for the second straight month in September. The rate fell 0.2 percentage points, from 8.2 percent in August to 8.0 percent in September. (Figure 1) The unemployment rate at the national level also decreased this past month, from 8.1 percent in August to 7.8 percent in September. Fortunately, the decreases in both the national and Colorado rates were for the right reasons. The rates were down because of an increase in employment, not because of people exiting the labor force, a sign that the job market may be improving.

Click to enlarge















In the latest edition of Colorado Recovery Watch, Rice Fellow Andrew Ball examines a range of data showing where the state of Colorado stands on the road to economic recovery.
Colorado Recovery Watch is a monthly snapshot of economic data, with a special focus on jobs and public-assistance programs. Read it online, along with other analysis of jobs and economic security from the Colorado Center on Law and Policy.

Thursday, September 27, 2012

New poverty estimates paint grim picture for many communities throughout Colorado


New data released from the U.S. Census Bureau's annual American Community Survey show a continued struggle for many Colorado citizens as recovery stagnates.

  • The overall poverty rate in Colorado was statistically unchanged from 2010 to 2011. In 2011, more than 674,000 people, or 13.5 percent of the state's population, lived below the federal poverty line.
  • In 2011, 9.1 percent of Colorado families lived in poverty a 0.3 percentage point decrease from 2010. However, in 2007 only 8.4 percent of Colorado families lived in poverty.
  • The Colorado child poverty rate was up almost 2 percentage points in 2011 compared with the 2007 level. In 2011, more than 211,000 children, or 17.5 percent of all Colorado children lived in poverty.
  • 6.1 percent of Colorado's population lived in deep poverty, or below 50 percent of the federal poverty line 2011.

Click to enlarge

Taking stock of the most recent data from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey, it is clear that many Coloradoans are still struggling to cope with the effects of the 2007 recession. It is also clear that typically disadvantaged demographic groups such as the African-American or Latino communities are facing huge challenges as poverty rates hover around 25 percent. Furthermore, there is great inequality between men and women as women face an economic reality with higher rates of poverty and lower annual earnings. In light of the disparity in economic well-being demographic categories, policy makers need to place priority on developing a pathway to self-sufficiency that will provide education, jobs and a higher quality of life for all Coloradoans regardless of race, gender or class.
The Colorado Center on Law and Policy's analysis of the newest Census Bureau Data looks at poverty from several angles, including race, gender and family type.

The Colorado Center on Law and Policy, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research and advocacy organization seeking justice and economic security for all Coloradans. 

Friday, August 31, 2012

To Labor on Labor Day

By Kathy White

This weekend, many Coloradans will celebrate Labor Day as Coloradans have since 1887.  More than 125 years ago, the Colorado General Assembly designated a “Labor Day” to honor the effort and achievements of the worker. Congress followed suit in 1894 declaring the first Monday in September the national holiday that we still celebrate today.1 And while the Labor Day celebrations that we’ll see this weekend will look a lot like those from decades past – picnics, parades, leisure time with family and friends – the workers we celebrate and the value we place on their labor are quite different.

The United States worker has never worked harder, produced more or played less. U.S. workers log long hours – more than competitors in other developed countries like the United Kingdom, Japan and Germany.2 U.S. workers also take and are offered less paid time off (PTO) than peers in every other developed nation. On average, the U.S. worker is given 12-14 days PTO, but most of our workers use half or less of those days for economic reasons.3 Remarkably, the U.S., unlike every other developed nation on the globe, including those with economies that outperform ours, does not require employers to provide PTO of any kind – not to rejuvenate and celebrate, not to heal from an illness, not to recover from a death in the family and not to adjust to the birth or adoption of a new baby.

Moreover, the typical worker today must invest more in themselves in order to compete in to today’s “knowledge-based economy.” Today, roughly two-thirds of students seeking a bachelor’s degree borrow money from banks to do it, when just 20 years ago only 45 percent borrowed for college.4 Today, the average worker is saddled with thousands of dollars in debt right out of the gate.

Yet, despite this effort and achievement, today’s worker reaps less benefit from their work and sacrifice than ever before. According to research by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), from the late 1940s to the mid-1970s productivity and hourly pay for workers grew hand-in-hand. But something went awry in the 1970s, something that continues to steamroll today. Productivity continued to grow, but worker compensation stagnated. From 1973 to 2011, productivity grew by more than 80 percent while median hourly compensation grew by just under 11 percent.5 (See Figure 1).

Figure 1
Mishel, Lawrence. “The Wedges Between Productivity and Median Compensation Growth,” Economic Policy Institute, April 26, 2012. Available at http://www.epi.org/publication/ib330-productivity-vs-compensation/

Click to Enlarge


The smart guys over at EPI attribute this “wedge” between productivity and compensation to three things: 1) inequality of compensation; 2) shifts in labor’s share of all income; and 3) divergence of consumer and output prices.6 What does that mean? Well, I’m not an economist, but it basically boils down to this: the first means the gap between how much income in the economy went to the worker and how much went to owners of capital. The second means the growing gap in income between high income workers and everyone else. And the third means the gap between the price of what U.S. workers buy and what they make. While the economists over at EPI carefully explain each of these in great detail, by sub-period no less, in their upcoming signature publication, The State of Working America 2012,7 the main reason why workers today benefit less from their hard work than ever before is growing inequality. Inequality between workers, i.e. average workers and CEOs. Inequality between those who work and those who own, i.e. average workers and corporations.  

Yes, you’re probably wishing you could dust off your version of Marx’s Das Kapital about now or maybe you have a hankering to dig out that old Pink Floyd Animals album. You may even feel like you want to review anthropologist David Harvey’s 10-minute RSS Animate refresher that went viral earlier this year, the Crises of Capitalism.8 (Or maybe you’re just thinking that I did to write this blog.) But none of that is necessary to get the real point, which is: from 1973-2011 less income generated in the economy went to wages and more went to capital. In other words, owners of capital took the gains of productivity as income (dividends, interest, profits) for themselves, rather than sharing those gains with workers through greater wages and better benefits. And this is a policy issue – not some natural economic storm that has befallen the U.S., which means, it’s a reversible trend, a solvable problem.

Since the mid 1970s, the U.S. has witnessed an all-out assault on unions and every worker’s right to collectively fight for better wages, greater safety and decent benefits. When wages and productivity were happily growing together in a long marriage of shared prosperity, the number of workers covered by unions was at its highest point. In 1973, more than a quarter of all U.S. workers benefited from union coverage. By 2011, that number had dropped to just13 percent.9 (See Figure 2)

Figure 2
Mishel, Lawrence. “Unions, Inequality and Faltering Middle-Class Wages,” Economic Policy Institute, August 29, 2012. Available at http://www.epi.org/publication/ib342-unions-inequality-faltering-middle-class/

Click to Enlarge


Weakened labor unions has not only meant that there are fewer union members who enjoy the higher pay and better benefits negotiated by their union, but also that there are fewer labor standards that protect and benefit all workers. Weakened labor unions has made it near impossible for the average individual wage earner today to reap the benefits of their long hours and increased productivity. It has left the individual worker almost powerless to negotiate for health insurance, paid sick days or family leave, education and training benefits, higher wages or even a national holiday to celebrate the achievement and effort of the American worker.

But it doesn’t need to be this way. We can all support our friends in labor and advocate for policies that advance our common ideals of equality, opportunity for all and shared prosperity. So this Labor Day, amidst the picnics and parades, we should all take a moment to reflect and consider what we can do throughout the year to truly honor the achievement and effort of the American worker.

Kathy White
303-573-5669 ext. 303


Friday, July 20, 2012

Colorado Recovery Watch - June 2012


The most recent economic data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics for the month of June show a step in the wrong direction compared with May numbers. The month of June saw an increase in the state unemployment rate, which includes the self-employed and farm workers, as well as the state labor force. In addition, another survey reported data that excludes the self-employed and farm workers and showed a net decrease in employment for the month of June. Clearly, the recovery from the Great Recession has been timid at best and has yet to solidify in Colorado or nationwide. Fortunately, enrollment in the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Supplementary Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as food stamps, decreased in the month of April (the most recent data available), regaining some of the ground lost during the month of March.

Unemployment
In June, Colorado’s unemployment rate increased for the third consecutive month to 8.2 percent. (Figure 1) Although this 8.2 percent unemployment rate is still 0.2 percentage points lower than June of last year, it is a 0.1 percentage point increase from May and a return to the September 2011 level. The June unemployment rate is now over 4 percentage points higher than when the recession began and puts the Colorado unemployment rate even with the National unemployment rate.















Colorado’s unemployment rate is tied for 13th highest among the 50 states.1 Unfortunately, the most recent economic forecasts from the Colorado Legislative Council Staff, released in June, show a slightly disheartening outlook for the Nation’s and Colorado’s economy throughout the rest of 2012. The Colorado Legislative Council’s report notes that while the manufacturing sector and the real estate market have improved slightly, employment, income and consumer spending have slowed most likely due to the large amount of uncertainty in many aspects of the economy.2


In the latest edition of Colorado Recovery Watch, Rice Fellow Andrew Ball examines a range of data showing where the state of Colorado stands on the road to economic recovery.


Colorado Recovery watch is a monthly snapshot of economic data, with a special focus on jobs and public assistance programs. Read it online, along with other analysis of jobs and economic security from the Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute, a project of the Colorado Center on Law and Policy.



Andrew Ball
CC/Rice Fellow
aball@cclponline.org
303-573-5669 ext. 316

Thursday, June 28, 2012

“…With Liberty and Justice for All?”


Income and employment data still reflect significant racial disparity.  This year’s 147th anniversary celebration of Juneteenth offers an ideal backdrop for considering these challenging economic conditions.  Juneteenth commemorates the exceptionalism of American liberty, by celebrating the extension of freedom for historically disenfranchised communities, including Blacks, Latinos, and Native Americans. While the country has made significant gains since President Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation in1863, vestiges of slavery and second class citizenship still abound, particularly in regard to income and employment.  “Liberty and justice for all,” while a rallying cry of American freedom, still remains elusive to some.  The following data illustrates the continuing disparity within labor force participation, household income, and socio-economic standing across Colorado’s racial and ethnic demography.  





Labor Force Presence (2011):
Nationwide Americans participated in the labor force at a rate of 64 percent in 2011, the lowest participation rate in over a decade. (Figure 5)  Colorado’s own labor force participation remains above the national average at 70 percent, with African Americans in Colorado participating at nearly the same rate as Asians and 5 percent lower than white Americans. (Figure 9) Meanwhile Hispanics participate competitively at a rate of 69 percent, 3 percentage points higher than Asians and a percentage point below whites. (Figure 9)





Employment Disparity (2011):
Because of the Great Recession, many people have struggled to find full-time employment and so have temporarily settled for part-time positions.  Among part-time workers Hispanics are more likely to be involuntarily employed part time, while whites are half as likely as Hispanics to be involuntarily employed part time. (Figure 14) In fact both Hispanics and African Americans are underemployed and unemployed almost twice as much as whites. (Figure 18) 








Income Disparity:
Minority populations’ income also reflects racial disparity. In Colorado Black Americans earn 67 percent of the income that their white counterparts earn. (Figure 31) Comparatively, Hispanics and American Indians earn (respectively) 62 percent and 57 percent of the income that white Americans earn. 





Poverty Post-Recession:
Considering the degree of labor and income inequity in Colorado, it comes as no surprise that from 2000-2010 the number of  Colorado children living in poverty increased by 201 percent (according to the US Census Bureau’s American Community Survey).  Now, it is important to mention that despite this significant increase, Colorado’s poverty rate is actually below the national average of 15 percent. (Figure 37)  In fact, the Foundation on Child Development identifies youth under 18 years of age as the largest demographic of America’s poor.1 Worse still, African Americans, Latinos, and American Indians in Colorado are nearly 3 times as likely as whites to be living under the federal poverty level (at $11,344 for singles and $22,113 for a family of four).  (Figure 42)  






Progress:
While each successive anniversary of Juneteenth has seen socio-economic improvement for Black Americans and other historically disenfranchised communities, the data shows that minority populations still suffer disproportionately from poverty, income disparity, and social inequity.  Yet, as Juneteenth celebrations wrap up, we cannot help but be hopeful that the promise of today’s youth will birth tomorrow’s progress. 



For more information regarding ethnic and racial inequity in Colorado, see our report: The State of Working Colorado 2012.

By: Uloma Chiakpo
EARN Intern
uchiakpo@cclponline.org


1The Colorado Children’s Campaign,  2011 Kids Count in Colorado, (2011), 8 <http://www.coloradokids.org/data/publications/>

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Colorado Recovery Watch - May 2012


The most recent economic data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics show mixed trends for the recovery. The month of May saw an increase in the state unemployment rate, which includes the self-employed and farm workers, as well as an increase in the state labor force. Interestingly, another survey reported data that excludes the self-employed and farm workers and showed a net increase in employment for the month of May. However, a robust jobs recovery has yet to solidify in Colorado or nationwide. Enrollment in the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Supplementary Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as food stamps, erased positive movement in February as enrollment increased by nearly 7,500 people in the month of March (the most recent data available).

Unemployment
In May, Colorado’s unemployment rate increased for the second consecutive month to 8.1 percent. (Figure 1) Although this 8.1 percent unemployment rate is still 0.3 percent lower than May of last year, it represents a 0.2 percent increase from April and a return to the October 2011 level. The national unemployment rate also saw a 0.1 percent increase to 8.2 percent during the month of May leaving the rate 0.8 percent lower than May 2011.



In the latest edition of Colorado Recovery Watch, Rice Fellow Andrew Ball examines a range of data showing where the state of Colorado stands on the road to economic recovery.

Colorado Recovery Watch is a monthly snapshot of economic data, with a special focus on jobs and public-assistance programs. Read it online, along with other analysis of jobs and economic security from the Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute, a project of the Colorado Center on Law and Policy.

Monday, June 18, 2012

Recently bankrupt, Blockbuster gets tax credit for growth in Colorado


Blockbuster is growing. Really?  I know I’ve seen more than one store close. But the Colorado Economic Development Commission concluded that Blockbuster is a job creator when it agreed to grant the shrinking company a jobs growth tax credit.

Blockbuster, the movie-rental company that is closing stores and laying off employees all over the country, was recently awarded  a $2.5 million “jobs growth” tax credit for relocating positions to its corporate headquarters in Colorado.

The company announced April 23 that it will move its corporate headquarters from McKinney, Texas to the campus of its parent-company, Dish Network, in Douglas County. The announcement came the same day that the EDC approved the tax credit. The move comes on the heels of the Dish Network purchasing Blockbuster out of bankruptcy last year as Blockbuster struggled to compete with relative newcomers Redbox and Netflix in the movie rental industry. Along the way, Blockbuster closed more 1,500 retail stores throughout the country, including an unknown number in Colorado. In Texas alone, the company laid off 567 people this year, according to the Texas Workforce Commission. Blockbuster now plans to relocate 150 of those Texas-based positions to Colorado.

The Jobs Growth income tax credit was the hallmark economic recovery legislation approved by the General
Assembly in 2009. That legislation said a company must prove four factors to qualify for the tax credit. First, the company could “reasonably and efficiently” locate the project in another state. Second, at least one other state is in consideration. Third, the tax credit is a “major factor” in the company’s decision. Fourth, without the tax credit the company “is not likely to commence the project” in Colorado.

It’s not clear how Blockbuster meets those four criteria. The staff for the commission, the Office of Economic Development and International Trade, made available portions of company’s tax credit application. Nowhere in the portion of the application that was available for public review did the company state that the merger of the two headquarters would not happen without assistance from the state of Colorado.

But in the May 3 edition of the Highlands Ranch Herald, a Blockbuster spokesman said the company made the move because of the tax credit as well as the opportunity to “take advantage of efficiencies” in the human resources, finance and marketing departments.

Given the limited facts made available — especially the company acknowledging that the move creates efficiency — it’s reasonable to believe that the Blockbuster decision to merge with the headquarters of its parent company, Dish Network, would have happened even without the tax break.
Regardless, this Blockbuster deal exposes the challenges associated with tax giveaways in the name of job creation.  It is hard to imagine that anyone would identify Blockbuster as the kind of growing company that deserves specialized tax treatment for its role in “creating jobs”. 

Terry Scanlon can be reached at 303-573-5669 ext 311, or by email at tscanlon@cclponline.org

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Sidebar newsletter: After the election, Colorado still needs more revenue

An article from the winter 2012 edition of Sidebar, CCLP's quarterly newsletter.

The Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute, a project of the Colorado Center on Law and Policy, was a leading proponent of Proposition 103 on the state’s Nov. 1 election ballot. It would have restored state sales and income tax rates to their levels in the late 1990s and used the revenue to support education. In an audio interview, Fiscal Policy Institute Director Carol Hedges discusses the reasons Proposition 103 failed, lessons learned from the effort, and where Colorado goes from here. Excerpts of Hedges’ remarks follow. To listen to the full interview, visit bit.ly/chinterview.


“The primary message I take away from the results of 103 is that it is much harder to build a coalition of people to vote in favor of something than it is to build a coalition to vote against something. We know that there were a lot of concerns about the actual specific measure itself that caused many people to decide to vote against more funding for schools. Not because they don’t support funding for schools, but there were people that were concerned about whether it was the right mechanism, whether we were taxing the right people, whether it was big enough, whether it addressed enough of the comprehensive fiscal problems that the state is facing.”

“We moved the conversation on a balanced approach to dealing with the state’s fiscal problems, we moved that forward in a meaningful way. 103 was an important next step in the work that CCLP and COFPI have been doing over the last 10 years to start and to keep a conversation alive about the role of the public sector in building strong communities and a strong economy. … People are beginning to sense the real costs of not making appropriate investments. They see what’s happening in their communities because our schools and other public services aren’t funded.”

“One of the other interesting and important things about 103 is it allowed us to create contacts and relationships and identify literally thousands of people statewide who understand the importance of public education, understand the importance of public investments in having a vital and strong economy. We’ve got to keep talking to those people. We’ve got to help them with tools to be the advocates in their communities, to say ‘Yes, taxes mean that each of us pay a little bit more, but think about the benefits for our communities.’”

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Follow Budget Works 2012 in a live chat on Jan. 13

We'll be hosting a live chat from Budget Works from 8 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on Friday, Jan. 13. If you can't make it to the event in person, sign up for an e-mail reminder now and join us remotely.

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Be a Partner for Justice with CCLP

Our Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute is working each day to provide timely and objective analyses of state fiscal issues, but we can't do this important work without your help. Consider a monthly donation of $10, $25 or $50 to support this valuable work as a CCLP Partner for Justice!

Friday, June 3, 2011

The missing face at today's signing of Senate Bill 11-184

When Gov. John Hickenlooper signed Senate Bill 11-184 today, it was a big victory for transparency and accountability in government. One important face was missing at the signing ceremony, though. That's Ali Mickelson, the tax policy analyst for the Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute who deserves a lot of credit for getting the bill passed. Even though Ali's on vacation, we couldn't help but imagine she was there for the big event.


For details on the bill, check out a news release we issued today, plus the 2011 legislative review issued last month. Find more photos of the bill signing on our Facebook page.

Monday, May 9, 2011

Video: Watch Policy Analyst Alec Harris discuss the state's jobs landscape on 'Colorado State of Mind'

Alec Harris is a policy analyst for the Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute, a project of the Colorado Center on Law and Policy. He is author of the State of Working Colorado, and an issue brief released recently that examines the role undocument immigrant workers play in Colorado's economy. This episode of 'Colorado State of Mind' aired statewide on Friday, May 6.

Watch the full episode. See more Colorado State of Mind.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Follow CCLP at the Colorado General Assembly

Want to know more about how we're fighting for justice and economic security for all Coloradans? Check out our work during the 2011 session of the Colorado General Assembly. New websites show the bills we're following and our positions. There are sites for the Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute, the Health Care Program, the Family Economic Security Program and justice-related issues CCLP tracks.



Friday, December 17, 2010

Register today for Budget Works on Jan. 14 -- Out With the Old, In With the Revenue

It's the annual conference of the Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute, where you'll get the information and strategy you need to work for a better Colorado. Check out details of the agenda and a link to the registration website.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

American Community Survey offers a detailed snapshot of the country

The U.S. Census Bureau today released its annual American Community Survey, a detailed look at life in this country. We're interested, of course, in what the numbers say about poverty, health insurance, income and other measures of well being. Check the website later today for an issue brief and news release breaking down the most important points. In the meantime, read the news release from the Census Bureau.


Friday, August 20, 2010

Thursday, August 19, 2010

Recovery Act benefits aren't just theoretical for COFPI analyst

Alec Harris, a policy analyst on the Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute team, has been elbow-deep lately in analysis of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. He sent an e-mail and photograph to the staff the other day showing some hands-on experience with the act's benefits:

"It's official …the Recovery Act has broken through all the barriers and into my personal life.

"I just got this from my dad. It’s from my trip to San Francisco a couple of weeks back, on a hike in near the Golden Gate Bridge. I had forgotten about the photo until now."

For all of the Fiscal Policy Institute's analysis of the Recovery Act, check the website.